Updates from October, 2020 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • kmitov 4:25 pm on October 23, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: , mandarin, utf, wget   

    "wget 1.20 is here!" (never in my life I though I'd say that) 

    (this particle is part of the Everyday Code series)

    There are tools that just work. Low level tolls doing much of the heavy lifting and one thing you know about them is that they work. You never write

    
    $ mv --version source target
    

    For that matter you also never write

    $ cp -- version 1.3 source target
    $ ssh --version 1.2.1 use@machine
    $ curl --version 773.2  url

    Same applies for wget. There are tools that always work. Because they do one thing and they do it well. Not that there are no version. There are. But today was the first time in my career that we had to upgrade a wget version. We moved from version 1.17 to 1.20

    Why the change

    What could have changed that made it important to update from 1.17 to 1.20?

    It was the introduction of support of some mandarin symbols. Mandarin. A language. Users were uploading files names with such symbols and we had to support them.

    The internet. What a beautiful place.

     
  • kmitov 4:22 am on October 21, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: gcc,   

    Advanced compilation with Google Closure Compiler 

    Tonight I am doing a live stream lecture about Google Closure Compiler and how we use it to compile the JavaScript code of the Instructions Steps Framework. The framework is the core of buildin3d.com where we deliver 3D assembly instructions.

    The repo for the lecture is located at https://github.com/thebravoman/google-closure-compiler-presentation/.

     
  • kmitov 5:38 am on October 19, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: management,   

    Don’t fix the issue in the software. Improve the process. 

    Yesterday one of the features on our platform did not work. I was in a meeting, demonstrating it over a shared screen and talking with a potential client. I went to the page showing the IS Editor in our buildin3d.com platform and the editor for editing the assembly instructions did not start. A little rush of embarrassment and a few milliseconds later I knew what I had to do. Thanks to my seniority and extended experience in the world of web development I moved my fingers lighting fast on the keyboard and I refreshed the page. The editor started. The demonstration continue.

    I could remember that I stumbled upon this issue a few days earlier and I saw that the IS Editor was not loading when you first visit the page. The meeting continue, I said something like “Sometimes when we are sharing the screen my bandwidth is small so we have to wait”. I suppose the client did not exactly understood what has just happen, but what I know is that the next time they try it on their side it will not work and they will be disappointed.

    Right after the meeting there was a problem I was facing. Should I now open the repo and start debugging or should I wait a day or two for our team to look at this.

    One of the most difficult things running a Software company as a good software developer is the patience to wait for the team of developers to resolve an issue.

    I was close to mad. How difficult could it be? After you commit something just go to the platform and see that it works. We have a lot of automation, a lot of testing and spec that have helped us a lot. We have a clean and I would say quite fast process for releasing a new version of any module to the platform. It takes anywhere from 2 minutes to about 20 minutes depending on what you are releasing. So after you release something just go and see and test and try it and make sure it works. How difficult could it be?

    I was mad. Like naturally and really mad. Not that this demonstration was almost ruined by this issue. I was mad that we’ve spend about 3-4 months working on this editor and it currently does not start. It is not true that the editor itself is not working. It is just not starting. Once it starts it works flawlessly, but a mis-configuration in the way it is started prevents it from even starting.

    It’s like getting to your Ferrary and it does not start because of law battery on your key or something. There is nothing wrong with the Ferrary itself, but your key is not working.

    In this state of anger I opened up the repo. I tracked down the moment it was introduced. And here is the dilemma:

    1. Should I now start debugging it, and resolving it?
    2. Should I just revert the last 11 days of commits and return the platform to a previous state completely removing the great improvements we’ve introduced in this last 11 days?
    3. Should I leave it for the next few days for the team to look at?

    The worst part is that I can fix the issue myself. But that is not my job. My team counts on me to spend more of my time with potential & existing clients, talking and discussing with them. Looking for ways they could integrate us. But in the same time I had an issue where a major feature is not working and will not work for the next few days and in one sleepless night I could resolve it.

    I don’t have this problem with the other departments. When there is an issue with some of the 3D product animations and models or there is an issue with some of the engineering designs I do not feel the urge to go and resolve this issue. I have the patience to rely on the team for this. Basically because I lack the knowledge and the tools to resolve such issues.

    Years ago when we were starting with 3D animations and models I had great interest, but I openly refused to install any software about 3D animations and models on my machine. I knew myself and I knew my team. In school an in university and was trying some 3D models and animations and it felt great. I learned a lot and I had some great time working on such projects. So I knew that if I install some of the software on my machine there will be issue that will come to me, but that was not my role in my organization.

    Same for engineering. I have the complete patience to wait for days for an engineering design task to complete. I never start the SOLIDWORKS myself and go on and “fix the things”. I could. I just don’t want as it will distract me from other important things and I know I can count on the engineers to do it.

    But with software it is always a little difficult. Not that I can not delegate. I can. There are large parts of the code we are running that I have never touched, or changed or anything. So I though – why was this particular issue different? What was my problem? Why was it bothering me? Why was this different from any other issue in software development that is reported, debugged and resolved. Where did the anger come from?

    I was angry because the process I’ve setup has allowed for this issue to occur.

    The IS Editor was working a few days ago. Now it was not working. This was not an issue of my software development skills, this was a challenge for my “organizing a software development process that produces a working software and deploys it to production a few times a day in a team with a large code base and a new R&D challenge that we were working on”.

    This I have found in my experience to be the most difficult problem for good software developers that mediocre and bad software developers do not face. When you know how to fix it, how to implement it and you take on the task then your time and energy is spend on resolving the issue. It might be better for the team as a whole if you spend your energy and resources on a different tasks – like how to avoid a regression in a multi-teams multi-frameworks environment.

    Know what is important and where your efforts would be most valuable. I’ve stepped up and did a lot of software development int he team. I’ve single-handedly implemented a number of frameworks. Not just the architecture, but actual implementation. I once deleted two human years of development and re-implemented the whole module almost from scratch. There is even a saying in the team “Kiril will roll up his sleeves and will implement this”.

    But no.

    There will always be issues in software development and we should think if our task is to resolve this issues, or to make sure this issues never occur in the first place. The later is objectively the more important and difficult task.

     
  • kmitov 5:23 pm on May 21, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: assets, dependency, , , , , rubygems,   

    With assets in a rails engine it could be Gemfile vs gemspec dependency that is messing it up 

    You have a rails engine. It has an asset (like a scss file). You include this engine in another engine. How do you test that the assets is correctly resolved?

    There is a moment when you simply can not understand where and how the asset is resolved/not resolved. The solution actually is in what are the Gemfile and .gemspec for a rails engine. Both of them could describe dependencies, but they contain different things.

    The whole premise of the situation seems strange until you get to building a rails engine that would contain the “theme” of your app. We go in this situation with two of our platforms – FLLCasts.com and 3DAssemblyInstructions.com. We wanted to have different layouts in different gems that are providing different look an feel- separate the main layout from dashboard and from main. We also wanted to have this layouts in a different gems so that we could release them with different versions and test them as separate gems in separate builds.

    Let’s get into this step by step tutorial and by the end I am sure you would know much about how assets are resolved, packed and testes when they are within a rails. Again I am writing this tutorial to help spread the knowledge internally, but the problem is so common that it might be of interest to the community as a whole.

    Case 1 – simple app with an asset

    Just to get the understanding correctly and to have a base we would create a simple rails app with an asset and start it. I am using rails 6 and ruby 2.6.5

    $ rails new simple_assets_app
    $ cd simple_asset_app
    # Create a new asset.scss file with some content
    $ echo "asset_style { background-color: white}" > app/assets/stylesheets/asset.scss
    $ rails s
    => Booting Puma
    => Rails 6.0.3.1 application starting in development 
    => Run `rails server --help` for more startup options
    Puma starting in single mode...
    * Version 4.3.5 (ruby 2.6.5-p114), codename: Mysterious Traveller
    * Min threads: 5, max threads: 5
    * Environment: development
    * Listening on tcp://127.0.0.1:3000
    * Listening on tcp://[::1]:3000
    Use Ctrl-C to stop
    
    

    In another terminal request the asset

    # Request the asset and dislay its content. Everything works. Perfect
    $ curl localhost:3000/assets/asset.scss
    asset_style { background-color: white}

    Case 2 – engine with an asset

    Now let’s build a rails plugin that would hold this asset

    $ rails plugin new simple_asset_engine --full
    $ cd simple_asset_engine/
    $ echo "asset_style { background-color: white}" > app/assets/stylesheets/asset.scss
    # You have to fix the TODOs in the gemspec. After you are ready do 
    $ rails s -p 3001
    => Booting WEBrick
    => Rails 6.0.3.1 application starting in development http://localhost:3001
    => Run `rails server --help` for more startup options
    [2020-05-21 19:48:51] INFO  WEBrick 1.4.2
    [2020-05-21 19:48:51] INFO  ruby 2.6.5 (2019-10-01) [x86_64-linux]
    [2020-05-21 19:48:51] INFO  WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=13394 port=3001
    

    Now that the port is different.

    Request the asset

    # Nothing strange here. Asset is delivered as expected.
    $ curl localhost:3001/assets/asset.scss
    asset_style { background-color: white}
    

    Conclusion – engine, no engine the asset is delivered.

    Case 3 – require simple_asset_engine in another engine

    This could be a requirement. It has happen to us. It is a valid case. It is rather strange to have one engine require another, but we are all grown ups here…

    $ rails plugin new host_engine --full
    # Fix todos in .gemspec
    
    # Add a dependency to simple_asset_engine. Asset should be found, rigth
    $ echo 'gem "simple_asset_engine", path: "~/axles/tmp/simple_asset_engine"' >> Gemfile
    
    # install gems - mainly the simple_asset_engine
    $ bundle install
    
    # Start server. Note the different port
    $ rails s -p 4010
    
    

    Request asset

    $ curl localhost:4010/assets/asset.scss
    asset_style { background-color: white}

    Asset is found.

    That’s the power of rails. It just works. You can have an asset in an app, asset in an engine, asset in an engine, required in another engine and the asset is always found. Except…

    This might sound as a conclusion, because everything works. Until you get to production, which is actually the only time it matters if anything works, but that’s another story.

    Our current host_engine depends on a gem with a local path in the local filesystem.

    host_engine: $ cat Gemfile
    source 'https://rubygems.org'
    git_source(:github) { |repo| "https://github.com/#{repo}.git" }
    
    # Declare your gem's dependencies in host_engine.gemspec.
    # Bundler will treat runtime dependencies like base dependencies, and
    # development dependencies will be added by default to the :development group.
    gemspec
    
    # Declare any dependencies that are still in development here instead of in
    # your gemspec. These might include edge Rails or gems from your path or
    # Git. Remember to move these dependencies to your gemspec before releasing
    # your gem to rubygems.org.
    
    # To use a debugger
    # gem 'byebug', group: [:development, :test]
    gem "simple_asset_engine", path: "~/axles/tmp/simple_asset_engine"

    This is something that we can not ship to production. That’s why we pack “simple_asset_engine” as a gem and place this gem in a gemrepo. This is not part of the tutorial so I will simulate it.

    We should also modify the host_engine.gemspec to depend on simple_asset_engine. We add a dependency.

    # in host_engine.gemspec we add
    
    spec.add_dependency "simple_asset_engine"
    

    This means – ‘add a dependency to “simple_asset_engine”‘. Our gem will host_engine will depend on ‘simple_asset_engine’, but and here is a but, but only for ‘production’ environment. So this means – “production”. To simulate the fact that we don’t have this gem in a repo we would change the dependency in the Gemfile to be only for production.

    # This means the same as spec.add_dependency 'simple_asset_engine' It add the gem as a dependency to production. We are doing it like this to simulate that we have 'spec.add_dependency' and the gem is coming from a gems repo
    
    gem "simple_asset_engine", group: [:production], path: "~/axles/tmp/simple_asset_engine"

    Now as you do request the asset a strange error occurs:

    $ curl localhost:4010/assets/asset.scss
    <!DOCTYPE html>
    <html lang="en">
    <head>
      <meta charset="utf-8" />
      <title>Action Controller: Exception caught</title>
        ....
       <div id="Framework-Trace-0" style="display: none;">
          <code style="font-size: 11px;">
              <a class="trace-frames trace-frames-0" data-exception-object-id="47236752082100" data-frame-id="0" href="#">
                actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/debug_exceptions.rb:36:in `call'
              </a>
              <br>
              <a class="trace-frames trace-frames-0" data-exception-object-id="47236752082100" data-frame-id="1" href="#">
                actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/show_exceptions.rb:33:in `call'
              </a>
              <br>
              <a class="trace-frames trace-frames-0" data-exception-object-id="47236752082100" data-frame-id="2" href="#">
                railties (6.0.3.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:37:in `call_app'
              </a>
    ...
    </div>
    </body>
    </html>
    

    In the log you see

    ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches [GET] "/assets/asset.scss"):
      
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/debug_exceptions.rb:36:in `call'
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/show_exceptions.rb:33:in `call'
    railties (6.0.3.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:37:in `call_app'
    railties (6.0.3.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:26:in `block in call'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:80:in `block in tagged'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:28:in `tagged'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:80:in `tagged'
    railties (6.0.3.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:26:in `call'
    sprockets-rails (3.2.1) lib/sprockets/rails/quiet_assets.rb:11:in `block in call'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/logger_silence.rb:36:in `silence'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/logger.rb:64:in `block (3 levels) in broadcast'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/logger_silence.rb:36:in `silence'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/logger.rb:62:in `block (2 levels) in broadcast'
    sprockets-rails (3.2.1) lib/sprockets/rails/quiet_assets.rb:11:in `call'
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/remote_ip.rb:81:in `call'
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/request_id.rb:27:in `call'
    rack (2.2.2) lib/rack/method_override.rb:24:in `call'
    rack (2.2.2) lib/rack/runtime.rb:22:in `call'
    activesupport (6.0.3.1) lib/active_support/cache/strategy/local_cache_middleware.rb:29:in `call'
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/executor.rb:14:in `call'
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/static.rb:126:in `call'
    rack (2.2.2) lib/rack/sendfile.rb:110:in `call'
    actionpack (6.0.3.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/host_authorization.rb:82:in `call'
    railties (6.0.3.1) lib/rails/engine.rb:527:in `call'
    rack (2.2.2) lib/rack/handler/webrick.rb:95:in `service'
    

    It is basically telling us that an error occurred. An error also should occur. It is logical, it is the right thing to do, but it can take hours to debug and understand this.

    The error occurs because we are starting the rails server in ‘development’ environment and the dependency to ‘simple_asset_engine’ is only for production.

    Case 3.1 – change to production and development

    # Change host_engine/Gemfile to have
    
    gem "simple_asset_engine", group: [:production, :development], path: "~/axles/tmp/simple_asset_engine"
    

    Restart server on port 4010.

    host_engine: $ rails s -p 4010
    => Booting WEBrick
    => Rails 6.0.3.1 application starting in development http://localhost:4010
    => Run `rails server --help` for more startup options
    [2020-05-21 20:14:55] INFO  WEBrick 1.4.2
    [2020-05-21 20:14:55] INFO  ruby 2.6.5 (2019-10-01) [x86_64-linux]
    [2020-05-21 20:14:55] INFO  WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=14167 port=4010

    Request the asset

    $ curl localhost:4010/assets/asset.scss
    asset_style { background-color: white}

    Now it is time for conclusion

    spec.add_dependency in a gemspec gives you a dependency for production. There is a ‘spec.add_development_dependency’ that exists, but there are great discussion about it here https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/1104 Read more there. Really. Read more.

    But as we are trying to test assets separately in an engine it is important to understand what Gemfile and gemspec could be used for. If an asset is not found from a dependency of a gemspec, probably the whole dependency is required for a different environment. In the same time if the dependency contains only assets, it might be difficult to get what is happening at first sight and is it your fault, or that the F..k is sprockets doing or event what the bigger f..k is webpacker doing. But for this case it is just plain old ruby dependencies that are messing us up.

     
  • kmitov 8:45 am on April 22, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: css, , less, npm, , , , , yarn   

    Rails 6 + webpacker + yarn + Fancytree + LESS 

    We had to migrate a gem from using fancytree-rails as a ruby gem to a new rails 6 gem using webpacker and jquery.fancytree coming from npm. On top of that jquery.fancytree is using LESS (CSS) and you have to do a few configurations.

    App is available at https://github.com/thebravoman/rails6_webpacker_fancytree_less

    Here is how to do it it a few simple commands

    Table of contents

    Create a new rails project

    We want to have Fancrytree in this project.

       $ rails new project_with_less_and_fancytree
       $ cd project_with_less_and_fancytree
       $ rails g scaffold books
       $ rails db:migrate
     

    Add fancytree yarn package

    $ yarn add jquery.fancytree
       yarn add v1.22.4
       [1/4] Resolving packages...
       [2/4] Fetching packages...
       info fsevents@1.2.12: The platform "linux" is incompatible with this module.
       info "fsevents@1.2.12" is an optional dependency and failed compatibility check. Excluding it from installation.
       [3/4] Linking dependencies...
       warning " > webpack-dev-server@3.10.3" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^4.0.0 || ^5.0.0".
       warning "webpack-dev-server > webpack-dev-middleware@3.7.2" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^4.0.0".
       warning " > jquery.fancytree@2.35.0" has unmet peer dependency "jquery@>=1.9".
       [4/4] Building fresh packages...
       success Saved lockfile.
       success Saved 1 new dependency.
       info Direct dependencies
       └─ jquery.fancytree@2.35.0
       info All dependencies
       └─ jquery.fancytree@2.35.0
       Done in 3.29s.

    I like yarn.

    Add less and less-loader

    Later to include fancytree we would have to do things like

    import 'jquery.fancytree/dist/skin-lion/ui.fancytree.less'

    This means fancytree uses LESS. So we need to process this .less files. Oh, css, oh you evil you.

    yarn add less

    $ yarn add less
       yarn add v1.22.4
       [1/4] Resolving packages...
       warning less > request@2.88.2: request has been deprecated, see https://github.com/request/request/issues/3142
       [2/4] Fetching packages...
       info fsevents@1.2.12: The platform "linux" is incompatible with this module.
       info "fsevents@1.2.12" is an optional dependency and failed compatibility check. Excluding it from installation.
       [3/4] Linking dependencies...
       warning " > jquery.fancytree@2.35.0" has unmet peer dependency "jquery@>=1.9".
       warning " > less-loader@5.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^2.0.0 || ^3.0.0 || ^4.0.0".
       warning " > webpack-dev-server@3.10.3" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^4.0.0 || ^5.0.0".
       warning "webpack-dev-server > webpack-dev-middleware@3.7.2" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^4.0.0".
       [4/4] Building fresh packages...
       success Saved lockfile.
       success Saved 4 new dependencies.
       info Direct dependencies
       └─ less@3.11.1
       info All dependencies
       ├─ asap@2.0.6
       ├─ image-size@0.5.5
       ├─ less@3.11.1
       └─ promise@7.3.1
       Done in 5.80s.

    yarn add less-loader

    You need less and less-loader

    $ yarn add less-loader
       yarn add v1.22.4
       [1/4] Resolving packages...
       [2/4] Fetching packages...
       info fsevents@1.2.12: The platform "linux" is incompatible with this module.
       info "fsevents@1.2.12" is an optional dependency and failed compatibility check. Excluding it from installation.
       [3/4] Linking dependencies...
       warning " > jquery.fancytree@2.35.0" has unmet peer dependency "jquery@>=1.9".
       warning " > webpack-dev-server@3.10.3" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^4.0.0 || ^5.0.0".
       warning "webpack-dev-server > webpack-dev-middleware@3.7.2" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^4.0.0".
       warning " > less-loader@5.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "less@^2.3.1 || ^3.0.0".
       warning " > less-loader@5.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "webpack@^2.0.0 || ^3.0.0 || ^4.0.0".
       [4/4] Building fresh packages...
       success Saved lockfile.
       success Saved 2 new dependencies.
       info Direct dependencies
       └─ less-loader@5.0.0
       info All dependencies
       ├─ clone@2.1.2
       └─ less-loader@5.0.0
       Done in 3.26s.
     

    Add less-loader to webpack environment

    They must be registered. Probably in another file, but here in enrovonments.js is fine this tutorial.

    // config/webpack/environments.js
    
    const { environment } = require('@rails/webpacker')
    
    // THIS IS THE NEW CODE
    const less_loader= {
      test: /\.less$/,
      use: ['css-loader', 'less-loader']
    };
    environment.loaders.append('less', less_loader)
    // END: THIS IS THE NEW CODE
    
    module.exports = environment

    Use fancytree

    Check out the documentation at https://github.com/mar10/fancytree/wiki#use-a-module-loader

    But basically you must require fancytree and use it.

    // NOTE: This seems to be working
    // app/javascripts/packs/application.js
    
    //... some other code.
    
    // THIS IS THE NEW CODE ADDED AT THE BOTTOM OF application.js
    // Import LESS or CSS:
    import 'jquery.fancytree/dist/skin-lion/ui.fancytree.less'
    
    const $ = require('jquery');
    
    const fancytree = require('jquery.fancytree');
    require('jquery.fancytree/dist/modules/jquery.fancytree.edit');
    require('jquery.fancytree/dist/modules/jquery.fancytree.filter');
    
    console.log(fancytree.version);
    
    $(function(){
      $('#tree').fancytree({
        extensions: ['edit', 'filter'],
        source: [
          {title: "Node 1", key: "1"},
          {title: "Folder 2", key: "2", folder: true, children: [
            {title: "Node 2.1", key: "3"},
            {title: "Node 2.2", key: "4"}
          ]}
        ],
      });
      const tree = fancytree.getTree('#tree');
      // Note: Loading and initialization may be asynchronous, so the nodes may not be accessible yet.
    })
    // END: THIS IS THE NEW CODE ADDED AT THE BOTTOM OF application.js

    NOTE – import is kind of not working

    There is another configuration at https://github.com/mar10/fancytree/wiki#use-a-module-loader but I could not make it work

    // NOTE: This is not working
    import 'jquery.fancytree/dist/skin-lion/ui.fancytree.less';  // CSS or LESS
    import {createTree} from 'jquery.fancytree';
    import 'jquery.fancytree/dist/modules/jquery.fancytree.edit';
    import 'jquery.fancytree/dist/modules/jquery.fancytree.filter';
    
    const tree = createTree('#tree', {
      extensions: ['edit', 'filter'],
      source: [
          {title: "Node 1", key: "1"},
          {title: "Folder 2", key: "2", folder: true, children: [
            {title: "Node 2.1", key: "3"},
            {title: "Node 2.2", key: "4"}
          ]}
        ],
    });
    // Note: Loading and initialization may be asynchronous, so the nodes may not be accessible yet.

    Start the application

    $ rails s
    => Booting Puma
    => Rails 6.0.2.2 application starting in development 
    => Run `rails server --help` for more startup options
    Puma starting in single mode...
    * Version 4.3.3 (ruby 2.6.5-p114), codename: Mysterious Traveller
    * Min threads: 5, max threads: 5
    * Environment: development
    * Listening on tcp://127.0.0.1:3000
    * Listening on tcp://[::1]:3000
    Use Ctrl-C to stop
    Started GET "/" for ::1 at 2020-04-22 09:20:06 +0300
       (0.4ms)  SELECT sqlite_version(*)
       (0.2ms)  SELECT "schema_migrations"."version" FROM "schema_migrations" ORDER BY "schema_migrations"."version" ASC
    Processing by Rails::WelcomeController#index as HTML
      Rendering /home/user/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.5/gems/railties-6.0.2.2/lib/rails/templates/rails/welcome/index.html.erb
      Rendered /home/user/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.5/gems/railties-6.0.2.2/lib/rails/templates/rails/welcome/index.html.erb (Duration: 17.4ms | Allocations: 471)
    Completed 200 OK in 45ms (Views: 25.4ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms | Allocations: 2931)
    
    
    Started GET "/books" for ::1 at 2020-04-22 09:20:09 +0300
    Processing by BooksController#index as HTML
      Rendering books/index.html.erb within layouts/application
      Book Load (0.2ms)  SELECT "books".* FROM "books"
      ↳ app/views/books/index.html.erb:13
      Rendered books/index.html.erb within layouts/application (Duration: 29.0ms | Allocations: 1230)
    [Webpacker] Compiling...
    [Webpacker] Compiled all packs in /home/user/axles/tmp/project_with_less_and_fancytree/public/packs
    [Webpacker] Hash: 32e57f147dbdcbbf0c82
    Version: webpack 4.43.0
    Time: 2269ms
    Built at: 04/22/2020 9:20:13 AM
                                         Asset       Size       Chunks                         Chunk Names
        js/application-bbe9c4a129ab949e0636.js    124 KiB  application  [emitted] [immutable]  application
    js/application-bbe9c4a129ab949e0636.js.map    139 KiB  application  [emitted] [dev]        application
                                 manifest.json  364 bytes               [emitted]              
    Entrypoint application = js/application-bbe9c4a129ab949e0636.js js/application-bbe9c4a129ab949e0636.js.map
    [./app/javascript/channels sync recursive _channel\.js$] ./app/javascript/channels sync _channel\.js$ 160 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/channels/index.js] 211 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/packs/application.js] 749 bytes {application} [built]
    [./node_modules/webpack/buildin/module.js] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 552 bytes {application} [built]
        + 3 hidden modules
    
    Completed 200 OK in 3998ms (Views: 3994.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.7ms | Allocations: 23364)
    

    Open /books

    Visit http://localhost:3000/books. You should see no books

    Started GET "/books" for ::1 at 2020-04-22 09:23:56 +0300
    Processing by BooksController#index as HTML
      Rendering books/index.html.erb within layouts/application
      Book Load (0.2ms)  SELECT "books".* FROM "books"
      ↳ app/views/books/index.html.erb:13
      Rendered books/index.html.erb within layouts/application (Duration: 1.7ms | Allocations: 633)
    [Webpacker] Compiling...
    [Webpacker] Compilation failed:
    Hash: 60e4cd172f04061a66be
    Version: webpack 4.43.0
    Time: 4365ms
    Built at: 04/22/2020 9:24:02 AM
                                         Asset       Size       Chunks                         Chunk Names
        js/application-6ffd14b1620a1ad7ff96.js    717 KiB  application  [emitted] [immutable]  application
    js/application-6ffd14b1620a1ad7ff96.js.map    841 KiB  application  [emitted] [dev]        application
                                 manifest.json  364 bytes               [emitted]              
    Entrypoint application = js/application-6ffd14b1620a1ad7ff96.js js/application-6ffd14b1620a1ad7ff96.js.map
    [./app/javascript/channels sync recursive _channel\.js$] ./app/javascript/channels sync _channel\.js$ 160 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/channels/index.js] 211 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/packs/application.js] 1.52 KiB {application} [built]
    [./node_modules/webpack/buildin/module.js] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 552 bytes {application} [built]
        + 9 hidden modules
    

    Change books.html.erb

    Add a div element with id=tree

    Books

    <%# app/vies/books/index.html.erb %>
    <p id="notice"><%= notice %></p>
    
    <!-- THIS HERE IS WHAT WE ARE ADDING -->
    
    <div id="tree"></div>
    
    <!-- END: THIS HERE IS WHAT WE ARE ADDING -->
    
    <h1>Books</h1>
    
    <table>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th colspan="3"></th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
    
      <tbody>
        <% @books.each do |book| %>
          <tr>
            <td><%= link_to 'Show', book %></td>
            <td><%= link_to 'Edit', edit_book_path(book) %></td>
            <td><%= link_to 'Destroy', book, method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'Are you sure?' } %></td>
          </tr>
        <% end %>
      </tbody>
    </table>

    Final picture

    Showing how books index works with fancytree

    Errors that might occur

    No less-loader

    If no less loader is available the following could occur.

    Started GET "/books" for ::1 at 2020-04-22 08:52:40 +0300
       (0.1ms)  SELECT sqlite_version(*)
    Processing by BooksController#index as HTML
      Rendering books/index.html.erb within layouts/application
      Book Load (0.2ms)  SELECT "books".* FROM "books"
      ↳ app/views/books/index.html.erb:13
      Rendered books/index.html.erb within layouts/application (Duration: 2.1ms | Allocations: 762)
    [Webpacker] Compiling...
    [Webpacker] Compilation failed:
    Hash: 6210a48eff6aa0097a4c
    Version: webpack 4.43.0
    Time: 1464ms
    Built at: 04/22/2020 8:52:43 AM
                                         Asset       Size       Chunks                         Chunk Names
        js/application-8dcd2b9e8cc222d43650.js    718 KiB  application  [emitted] [immutable]  application
    js/application-8dcd2b9e8cc222d43650.js.map    841 KiB  application  [emitted] [dev]        application
                                 manifest.json  364 bytes               [emitted]              
    Entrypoint application = js/application-8dcd2b9e8cc222d43650.js js/application-8dcd2b9e8cc222d43650.js.map
    [./app/javascript/channels sync recursive _channel\.js$] ./app/javascript/channels sync _channel\.js$ 160 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/channels/index.js] 211 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/packs/application.js] 1.07 KiB {application} [built]
    [./node_modules/webpack/buildin/module.js] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 552 bytes {application} [built]
        + 9 hidden modules
    
    ERROR in ./node_modules/jquery.fancytree/dist/skin-lion/ui.fancytree.less 28:0
    Module parse failed: Unexpected token (28:0)
    File was processed with these loaders:
     * ./node_modules/less-loader/dist/cjs.js
    You may need an additional loader to handle the result of these loaders.
    |  * Helpers
    |  *----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
    > .fancytree-helper-hidden {
    |   display: none;
    | }
     @ ./app/javascript/packs/application.js 19:0-59
    

    no less available

    If less was not installed this would happen

    Started GET "/books" for ::1 at 2020-04-22 09:26:54 +0300
    Processing by BooksController#index as HTML
      Rendering books/index.html.erb within layouts/application
      Book Load (0.1ms)  SELECT "books".* FROM "books"
      ↳ app/views/books/index.html.erb:13
      Rendered books/index.html.erb within layouts/application (Duration: 2.1ms | Allocations: 617)
    [Webpacker] Compiling...
    [Webpacker] Compilation failed:
    Hash: 1adef07918f113c9c28e
    Version: webpack 4.43.0
    Time: 1380ms
    Built at: 04/22/2020 9:26:56 AM
                                         Asset       Size       Chunks                         Chunk Names
        js/application-b032c274e5b1d8d383da.js    721 KiB  application  [emitted] [immutable]  application
    js/application-b032c274e5b1d8d383da.js.map    841 KiB  application  [emitted] [dev]        application
                                 manifest.json  364 bytes               [emitted]              
    Entrypoint application = js/application-b032c274e5b1d8d383da.js js/application-b032c274e5b1d8d383da.js.map
    [./app/javascript/channels sync recursive _channel\.js$] ./app/javascript/channels sync _channel\.js$ 160 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/channels/index.js] 211 bytes {application} [built]
    [./app/javascript/packs/application.js] 1.52 KiB {application} [built]
    [./node_modules/webpack/buildin/module.js] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 552 bytes {application} [built]
        + 9 hidden modules
    
    ERROR in ./node_modules/jquery.fancytree/dist/skin-lion/ui.fancytree.less
    Module build failed (from ./node_modules/less-loader/dist/cjs.js):
    Error: Cannot find module 'less'
    Require stack:
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/less-loader/dist/index.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/less-loader/dist/cjs.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/loadLoader.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModuleFactory.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/Compiler.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/webpack.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/utils/validate-options.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/utils/convert-argv.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js
    - /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/bin/webpack.js
        at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:982:15)
        at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:864:27)
        at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1044:19)
        at require (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:161:20)
        at Object.<anonymous> (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/less-loader/dist/index.js:8:36)
        at Module._compile (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:192:30)
        at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1178:10)
        at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1002:32)
        at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:901:14)
        at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1044:19)
        at require (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:161:20)
        at Object.<anonymous> (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/less-loader/dist/cjs.js:3:18)
        at Module._compile (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:192:30)
        at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1178:10)
        at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1002:32)
        at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:901:14)
        at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1044:19)
        at require (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:161:20)
        at loadLoader (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/loadLoader.js:18:17)
        at iteratePitchingLoaders (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:169:2)
        at iteratePitchingLoaders (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:165:10)
        at /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:176:18
        at loadLoader (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/loadLoader.js:47:3)
        at iteratePitchingLoaders (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:169:2)
        at runLoaders (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:365:2)
        at NormalModule.doBuild (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:295:3)
        at NormalModule.build (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:446:15)
        at Compilation.buildModule (/home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/Compilation.js:739:10)
        at /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/Compilation.js:981:14
        at /home/kireto/axles/tmp/pesho2/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModuleFactory.js:409:6
     @ ./app/javascript/packs/application.js 20:0-59
    
    Completed 200 OK in 2801ms (Views: 2800.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.1ms | Allocations: 5363)
    
     
  • kmitov 9:56 am on April 4, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: bundler, , geminabox, rake,   

    bundle exec vs non bundle exec. 

    This article is part of the series [Everyday code].

    We use bundler to pack parts of the Instruction Steps Framework, especially the parts that should be easy to port to the rails world. We learned something about Bundler so I decide to share it with everybody.

    TL; DR;

    Question is – which of these two should you use:

    # Call bundle exec before rake
    $ bundle exec rake 
    
    # Call just rake
    $ rake

    ‘bundle exec rake’ will look at what is written in your .gemspec/Gemfile while rake will use whatever is in your env.

    Gem.. but in a box
    gem inabox with bundler

    Bundle exec

    For example we use geminabox, a great tool to keep an internal repo of plugins. In this way rails projects could include the Instruction Steps framework directly as a gem. This makes it very easy for rails projects to use the Instruction Steps.

    To put a gem in the repo one must execute:

    $ gem inabox

    You could make this call in three different ways. The difference is subtle, but important.

    Most of the time the env in which your shell is working will be almost the same as the env in which the gem is bundled. Except with the cases when it is not.

    From the shell

    # This will use the env of the shell. Whatever you have in the shell.
    $ gem inabox

    From a rake file

    If you have this rake file

    require 'rails/all'
    
    task :inabox do 
      system("gem inabox")
    end

    then you could call rake in the following ways:

    rake inabox

    # This will call rake in the env defined by the shell in which you are executing
    $ rake inabox

    bundle exec rake inabox

    # This will call rake in the env of the gem
    $ bundle exec rake inabox

    When using the second call bundle will look at the ‘.gemspec’/’Gemfile’ and what is in the gemspec. If non of the gems in the .gemspec adds the ‘inabox’ command to the env then the command is not found and an error occurs like:

    ERROR:  While executing gem ... (Gem::CommandLineError)
        Unknown command inabox

    If ‘gem inabox’ is called directly from the shell it works, but to call gem inabox from a rake job you must have ‘geminabox’ as development dependency of the gem. When calling ‘gem inabox’ from a shell we are not using the development env of the gem, we are using the env of the shell. But once we call ‘bundle exec rake inabox’ and it calls ‘gem inabox’, this second call is in the environment of the gem. So we should have a development_dependency to the ‘geminabox’ gem:

     spec.add_development_dependency 'geminabox'

    Nice. Simple, nice, logical. One just has to know it.

     
  • kmitov 10:45 am on April 3, 2020 Permalink |
    Tags: bash, ,   

    99 versions are not good enough – [Everyday Code] 

    This article is part of the series [Everyday Code]

    You’ve done nothing until you release more than 99 versions of your product. 99 versions are just not good enough.

    TL;DR;

    Today we released version 103 of is-core – the core of the Instruction Steps Framework. We noticed a bug. Generally the build would produce two files:

    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.103.js - that is the current version 
    is-core-sdk-latest.js  - this is pointing to the content of the latest version. 

    Problem was that while the current version was 103, the latest version in is-core-sdk-latest.js was pointing to version is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.99.js.

    As a conclusion – You have done nothing until you’ve released at least 100 versions of your software (and probably at least it works through a millennium shift with a leap year, but that’s another story)

    Details

    It’s pretty simple actually. This is what we were doing to get the latest file generated:

    # Creates is-core-sdk-latest.js link to the latest compiled 
     cd ../../release
     rm is-core-sdk-latest.js -f
    -latest=`find is-core-sdk-* -type f | tail -1`
    +latest=`ls -1v is-core-sdk* | tail -1`
     echo "Latest sdk is: $latest"
    

    Notice the find is-core-sdk-* -type f | tail -1 If the files are like

    # Find all the files but they are listed in non natural order of the integer for the version.
    # This code is: BAD
    $ find is-core-sdk-* -type f 
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.102.js
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.103.js
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.97.js
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.98.js
    
    # If we get just the tail it will give us version 99 which is clearly not right
    $ find is-core-sdk-* -type f | tail -1
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.99.js
    

    I have done this mistake at least a few times in my career.

    Solution is an option in ls:

    # This code is GOOD
    # This will list all the files
    $ ls -1v is-core-sdk*
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.97.js
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.98.js
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.102.js
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.103.js
    
    # This will get just the last
    $ ls -1v is-core-sdk* | tail -1
    is-core-sdk-6.0.0.pre.103.js
    

    Moral of the story

    For months I thougth we have a rock solid infrastructure. There was almost no failed build. Delivery to production is in 2 minutes for a pretty complex framework with a lot of projects and modules. And then it “broke” after months of stable work just as we were to release version 100.

    Show me your 100-th version of your product. Then we can talk.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel